Uniform Prenuptial Agreement Act (Upaa)


Linker v. Linker, 470 p.2d 921 (Kolo. 1970); Hereditary object (f) A court may refuse to enforce a provision of a pre-marital contract if, within the framework of the convention as a whole[:] ยท provides couples with a flexible framework for marriage and marriage agreements, which promotes responsible planning and informed decision-making, and encourages potential spouses to consider in advance a wide range of issues that may affect their marriage; (c) A provision of a pre-marital contract that defines the rights or obligations of the parties with respect to custodial liability is not binding on the court. . . .

Comments are closed.